Builder did not form society at possession and have now done deed of apartment
Builder did not form society or apartment after final completion letter on 30.05.2012 because he wants to sell terrace which is illegal. He has already sold out 1 terrace.
On 03.02.2014, 17 members out of 21 decided to form society against builder and send first notice which builder rejected.
Then we approached Co-op department Pune and deputy registrar sent him 2nd notice on 07.03.2014.
After this notice Builder started deed of declaration on 09.03.2014
On 13.03.2014 builder done deed of apartment with the help of 4 members out of 21 members.
In between deputy registrar asked builder and one promoter from our society to present for hearings. After 3-4 hearings and almost 5-6 months later District Deputy Registrar's final decision on 30.6.2014
Is after registration of apartment from builder, we can't form society. Two registrations against same property not allowed. Though Deputy Registrar was aware of the decision why he took 3-4 hearings. He could have told us straight forward that it's impossible to form society now. But he did not. What he achieved by wasting our time, money. I can't mention it here what he has achieved.
Isn't it injustice to us? After 4 years from possession and after 2 years from completion
Letter when members started this process. There is no value to majority of members. There is no value for date we started first. If Builder do deed of apartment of 1 member, society can't be form. Isn't it unfair? What is this non sense?
There is no value for 17 members (Majority) but 1 builder and 1 member can form deed of apartment and after that society can't be form. What is this?
At one side government of Maharashtra supporting and calling people to come forward for conveyance deed and at other side you see the rules against common man and in favor of builders. We daily read article from newspaper on this. Minimum 5 members require, within 4 months from completion Apartment or society must be form where these rules here are in this case.
We should all come forward to stop this. We need your help.
This needs to change. Common man can't bear this all now. Enough is enough.
Present laws of co-operative housing department are in favor of builders. Please help us. There are many societies in Maharashtra facing such issues.
Please suggest. We will be really thankful to you.
Why these laws/rules is in favor of builders? Dep. registrar should not give stay to form cooperative housing society in this matter.
Advice from society consultant